Something a bit different for today’s post. I gave a short presentation at my local camera club today to answer a question on why photos taken by club members are sometimes blurry. You might find some of this information useful. Click on the pause button to stop on any slide.
If you would like to download a copy of the presentation, click below. You will need either Microsoft PowerPoint or a compatible presentation viewer to open the presentation.
Since I took up photography full-time 3 years ago, I’m much more informed about equipment and techniques. There are some well-rehearsed lines in this industry: photography is about shaping the light; remember to work the shot; don’t take pictures – make pictures. And on and on.
Many of those tomes are also around gear – usually put out by manufacturers I think. As an example, fast lenses (those with a maximum aperture of f/2.8 or larger) are always better than other lenses. Better for low light capture, better for managing depth of field, better for autofocus performance. Always buy the fastest lens you can afford.
Whenever I venture to purchase a new lens, I’m typically presented with the fastest lens first – the advanced option. But the more I’ve shot, the more I’ve come to question this equipment mantra. Most of the time, you DON’T need the fastest lens. Here’s why. Continue reading →
It’s the dog days of summer here in Canada. Photographers everywhere are getting out to capture the hum of life. Vacation photographs, outdoor events, family events, outdoor location shoots or special projects that have been waiting for the perfect day are all being recorded now. Even indoor work is at its height, with many hours of natural light available to help get the best shots.
In a month, we return to routine, which for some might include membership in the local camera club or association. I personally belong to three. Typically on hiatus in the summer, they launch with a bang in September. And we’ll all have lots of new material to share. But will we? Continue reading →
Photographing people comes with some additional complications not present when photographing still life. An obvious statement, you say. One such complication is the question of permission when photographing people informally.
Last week, I had dinner with acquaintances who insisted that photographers own all their images from the moment they are shot. Permission to use them is not required. I was also out shooting with others who believe that documents get in the way of artistic freedom, particularly in informal settings. I wanted to know more.
First, a disclaimer: this post is NOT legal advice. Every jurisdiction is different – it’s up to you to understand the laws that apply to you and how best to protect yourself. You should always follow any copyright and privacy laws, particularly if you hope to profit financially from your work.
And this post is not about formal portraits or events for hire (weddings, family milestones, freelance event photography, etc.), which typically include negotiations and signed contracts; it’s about the more spontaneous form of people photography known as “street” photography.
Spring has sprung. New life all around us, providing a wealth of photographic subjects. Perfect for macro photography. Macro photography reveals the smallest of these subjects, from tiny lichens to the wing details of insects to the inner sculpture of a summer bloom.
Macro photography requires only one unique piece of equipment: a lens that can focus within a tiny distance of the subject, resulting in an image that is the same size on the camera sensor as the subject is in real life. But macro lenses have an amazingly small depth of field, almost guaranteeing that some part of the image will be out of focus. What’s a photographer to do? Continue reading →
April and May are the traditional kickoff months for photography festivals in this area. Many photographers, themes and collections are on display. So many, in fact, that viewing all of their work is impossible, and isolating favourities can be challenging.
In a recent excursion, I participated in a discussion of photography as art. The premise was that in order to be noticed, you can’t just be a photographer – you need to be an artist. You need to give your photographs a distinctive look, a distinctive emotional connection to the viewer. This means going beyond just documenting a subject – it means creating a work of art. And this isn’t new – all successful photographers have realized and operated on this basis since the days of pinhole cameras.
This leaves me wondering. If photography must be art to be successful, is there a point where a photograph is no longer a photograph? And where is that line? The answer isn’t obvious. Here’s why…
For as long as I can remember, Adobe Photoshop has been the king of image editing software. It is used by professionals in the photographic and graphic industries to work wonders with any form of image, even allowing you to create an image without using any camera at all.
But the consumer revolution left Adobe a bit behind, with savvy semi-pro and enthusiast photographers looking for image editing options that were reasonably priced and didn’t require a college degree. To Adobe’s credit, they saw that demand and Adobe Lightroom was born. But recent moves to subscription services and releases of updates users didn’t want have set them back a bit. Room for others to step in? Now we have a new player in this arena – MacPhun’s Luminar. Continue reading →